Top
Shoplifting

Shoplifting 

We Have Offices Conveniently Located in Deland and Daytona Beach

Shoplifting is defined in Florida Statute 812.014. Shoplifting, or as it is otherwise known, “Retail Theft,” or “Petit Theft,” can be charged as both a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the value of the items the police claim you stole. The threshold to be charged with a felony is only $300.00; therefore, any item(s) totaling $300 or more can result in a third degree felony or higher. In addition, Retail Theft is a charge that can be enhanced the more convictions you have. After a single conviction for retail theft, the State can charge you with a first degree misdemeanor. After two convictions, you can be charged with a felony.

We have offices in DeLand and Daytona Beach and help clients throughout Central Florida fight their criminal charges. 

In addition to being charged with a crime, Attorney Matt Thompson is finding that many of his clients charged with shoplifting are being pursued civilly as well, as many clients receive a letter from the establishment trying to collect money. Attorney Thompson has had success warding off the civil attorneys in trying to collect from his clients. Some of the stores known to have sent such letters are the Wal-Mart branches in both DeLand and Orange City, as well as the Target store in Orange City, Florida. In most cases, the property is recovered when the suspect is caught; therefore, Attorney Matt Thompson argues that the store did not suffer any damages, and oftentimes he will threaten to file a countersuit for any attorney’s fees that will be incurred by his client if the store pursues his client for damages in civil court.

To prove the crime of shoplifting, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

The Defendant knowingly and unlawfully obtained or used, endeavored to obtain or use, the property of the victim; and

The Defendant unlawfully obtained or used the property with the intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the victim of his or her use of the property, OR, appropriate the victim’s property to themselves or another person.

The charge of theft can be enhanced to a first degree felony if any of the following items are the subject of the taking, or if any of the following acts are committed during the taking:

The property taken has a value of $100,000.00. (Note: this includes just plain old money, and it does not necessarily need to be personal property).

A semi-trailer that was deployed by law enforcement;

Cargo valued at $50,000.00 or more that has entered the stream of interstate commerce;

If the offender commits any grand theft, and:

In the course of committing the grand theft the offender uses a motor vehicle, such as a car or motorcycle, as an instrumentality to assist in the commission of the crime. (Note: This excludes using the motor vehicle solely as a getaway vehicle).

In the course of committing the offense, the offender damages the victim’s property in excess of only $1,000.00. This would include “smash and grab” or “ransacking one’s home.”

The charge of theft can be enhanced to a second degree felony if any of the following items are the subject of the taking, or if any of the following acts are committed during the taking:

The property stolen is valued at $20,000.00 or more, but less than $100,000.00. (Note: this includes just plain old money, and it does not necessarily need to be personal property).

The property stolen is cargo valued at less than $50,000.00 that has entered the stream of interstate commerce;

The property stolen is medical equipment, valued at $300.00 or more, and is taken from a facility licensed under chapter 395, or from an aircraft or vehicle permitted under chapter 401; and

The property stolen is law enforcement equipment valued at $300.00 or more, that is taken from an emergency vehicle.

The charge of theft can be enhanced to a second degree felony if any of the following items are the subject of the taking, or if any of the following acts are committed during the taking:

  • The property is valued at $300.00, but less than $5,000.00.
    • Valued at $5,000.00, but less than $10,000.00.
    • Valued at $10,000.00, but less than $20,000.00.
  • A will or a codicil, or other testamentary instrument;
  • A firearm (regardless of market value);
  • A motor vehicle (regardless of market value);
  • Any commercially farmed animal;
  • Any fire extinguisher;
  • Any amount of citrus fruit consisting of 2,000.00 or more individual pieces of fruit.
  • Property taken from a construction site identified by the posting of signage;
  • Any stop sign;
  • Anhydrous ammonia;
  • Any amount of controlled substances.

The theft statute is designed to protect the special needs of the citizens of the State of Florida. With the number of citrus groves and farmland found in DeLand, Florida, the theft statute covers its bases and protects those who work in that industry.

Client-Focused. RESULT-DRIVEN.

Working Closely with You To Build a Strong Case
  • All Charges Dismissed Racing on the Highway

    Client was arrested after leaving a car show in a fast vehicle. Officers suspected the client of racing another vehicle and police officers pulled him over, drug him out of his vehicle, and arrested him for both racing on the highway and resisting an officer without violence. Upon review of the body camera video, Attorney Matt Thompson raised an excessive use of force complaint against the arresting officer. All charges against the client were dismissed.

  • Charges Reduced to Simple Assault Aggravated Assault with a Firearm

    At the time these charges were filed, the State of Florida had a 3-year minimum mandatory for Aggravated Assault with a Firearm. Neighbors of the Client claimed that he pointed a shot gun at them and fired over their heads when they came onto his property. Police came out the following day and arrested the Client. Attorney Thompson found a CAD report where the police had investigated the crime the night of the incident and determined that there was insufficient evidence of the arrest. Attorney Thompson

  • All Charges Dismissed Racing on the Highway

    Client was arrested after leaving a car show in a fast vehicle. Officers suspected the client of racing another vehicle and police officers pulled him over, drug him out of his vehicle, and arrested him for both racing on the highway and resisting an officer without violence. Upon review of the body camera video, Attorney Matt Thompson raised an excessive use of force complaint against the arresting officer. All charges against the client were dismissed.

  • Penalties Reduced Grand Theft, Fleeing, Possession of a Fictitious Driver’s License

    Attorney Matt Thompson, through depositions and litigation was able to show that officers did not act according to the warrant by picking up the client immediately upon sight. The charge of Fleeing or Attempting to Elude Law Enforcement, which carries a mandatory felony conviction, was dismissed by the State and the client was offered probation and no felony conviction.

  • All Charges Dismissed Aggravated Battery on and Elderly Person

    The Defendant and his wife allowed the wife’s elderly mother to come to their home and remove her personal items. During this time the mother began to yell obscenities and attacked E.B. Both parties tried to remove the mother from the home and prevent further physical violence. The mother contacted police and stated that she had been attacked. Attorney Thompson contacted the State Attorney’s Office and met with opposing counsel before charges were filed.

  • No Charges Filed and Prevented Arrest Grand Theft

    Client was caring for her special needs sister. While caring for her she received advice from bank personnel to place her sister’s Disability Checks into a bank account in the Client’s name to avoid other family members from stealing money. Once the family members discovered this they called the police to investigate the Client. Attorney Thompson put together documentation showing how the money was being spent and met with police to further explain the situation. The police determined that there was no