Auto Theft and Carjacking Defense in Deland, Daytona Beach
Protecting Your Rights in Deland, Daytona Beach, and Central Florida
Carjacking, as outlined by Florida Statute 812.133, is the intentionally taking of another person’s vehicle through the use of force or fear. Carjacking, both with and without a firearm or deadly weapon, is a first degree felony punishable by up to 30 years of imprisonment, 30 years of probation, and a fine of $10,000.
We have offices in DeLand and Daytona Beach and help clients throughout Central Florida fight their criminal charges.
Understanding Carjacking: What You Need to Know
Carjacking is a first degree felony that occurs when the accused intentionally deprives the victim, permanently or temporarily, of the victim’s right, benefit, or use of a motor vehicle. While depriving the victim of their right to the vehicle, the victim must currently be in the custody of the vehicle, and the accused must use force, violence, assault, or fear while taking the vehicle. The element of force is what makes Carjacking different from Grand Theft of a Motor Vehicle. In theft cases, force or fear is not a necessary component to prove the charge. However, once those elements are introduced, the charge is elevated to Carjacking and faces harsher penalties.
Key Elements for Proving Carjacking Charges
In order to be convicted of carjacking, the State must prove the crime occurred beyond a reasonable doubt. They must prove (1) that the motor vehicle was in the custody of the victim; (2) that force, violence, assault, or putting in fear was used in the course of the taking; and (3) that the taking was done with the intent to either temporarily or permanently deprive the victim of his or her right or benefit of the vehicle. It is important to remember that the State has to prove all three elements, not just one or two of them. Put another way, if the State is able to prove element (1) – that the motor vehicle was in the custody of the victim – and element (3) – that the vehicle was done with the intent to deprive the victim of his or her right to the vehicle – but is unable to prove element (2) – that the taking was done with force or fear – then they have not proven the crime of Carjacking.
For many crimes, the common definition of a word does not exactly match the legal definition of a word. An example of this is the word “force” as used in the statute for carjacking. When the word “force” is used in everyday conversation, you might think of physically making a person do something, or threatening their safety. While these examples would count as force for Carjacking, force more specifically means force, violence, or assault that “overcomes the resistance of the victim or by putting in the victim in fear so that the victim does not resist” (Florida Jury Instructions Section 15.2). The resistance does not need to be to any particular extent, nor does it have to be any physical resistance; however, unless prevented by fear, in order to prove Carjacking, the State must prove that the accused used force, violence, or assault that was enough to overcome the victim’s resistance.
The resistance requirement, however, does not apply if the accused gives the victim any substance which renders the victim unconscious. In cases where this fact applies, the crime is still considered Carjacking, not Grand Theft of a Motor Vehicle.
Why Choose Thompson Law, P.A. for Your Carjacking Defense?
Carjacking is enhanceable if the person who is alleged to have committed the crime is found to be carrying a weapon or a firearm. The word “enhanceable” means that a person who is alleged to have committed Carjacking while carrying a weapon or firearm could face higher jail time, greater fines, or a minimum mandatory sentence. Thompson Law, PA. offers our attorney’s knowledge in the area of criminal law and will sit down and discuss your case for free in an initial consultation. Attorney Matt Thompson has over a decade of experience in the legal field. Formerly a state prosecutor, Matt understands the importance of negotiating with the State to create the best case scenario for his clients. As a defense attorney, Matt uses his extensive knowledge of the law to navigate his client’s case, create the arguments he will use in court, and provide you with a high quality defense. If you or someone you know is faced with a first degree felony such as Carjacking, time is of the essence: call Thompson Law today to set up a free case evaluation – }.
Understanding Auto Theft in DeLand and Daytona Beach
In the vibrant communities of DeLand and Daytona Beach, the issue of auto theft is a growing concern for residents. With the bustling streets and numerous events attracting visitors, the risk of vehicle theft can increase, leaving many locals feeling vulnerable. The Volusia County Sheriff's Office and the Daytona Beach Police Department are actively working to combat this issue, providing resources and support to help residents protect their vehicles.
Local residents often face the pain points of worrying about their vehicles being stolen, especially in busy areas like the Daytona Beach Boardwalk or during events at the DeLand Historic District. The fear of losing a vehicle not only affects daily life but can also lead to financial strain due to the costs associated with replacing a stolen vehicle or dealing with insurance claims. Understanding the local crime trends and taking proactive measures can help mitigate these risks.
Client-Focused. RESULT-DRIVEN.
Working Closely with You To Build a Strong Case
-
Deferred Prosecution Agreement Loitering and Prowling
Client became disoriented due to a medical condition and entered a car that did not belong to him, but looked just like his car. Attorney Thompson provided mitigation to the State concerning the Defendant’s medical issues and ensured the client would be offered a Deferred Prosecution Agreement by the State wherein all charges would be dismissed upon completion.
-
Penalties Reduced Grand Theft, Fleeing, Possession of a Fictitious Driver’s License
Attorney Matt Thompson, through depositions and litigation was able to show that officers did not act according to the warrant by picking up the client immediately upon sight. The charge of Fleeing or Attempting to Elude Law Enforcement, which carries a mandatory felony conviction, was dismissed by the State and the client was offered probation and no felony conviction.
-
All Charges Dismissed Domestic Violence
Client was texting a friend when her significant other tried to grab for her phone. When the client tried to pull away, the victim claimed that he was battered and the client was arrested and brought before DCF due a child being in the house. Attorney Matt Thompson wrote a letter to the State explaining the discrepancy in evidence and claimed that the client was in fact moving away from the victim and did not intentionally try to hit the victim. All charges against the client were dismissed.
-
All Charges Dismissed Domestic Battery
Defendant was trapped inside car where her boyfriend was acting aggressive. Defendant had to take legal action against the victim to remove him from vehicle. Attorney Thompson sent letter to State early in the case to outline defenses and mitigation and all charges were dismissed prior to filing.
-
All Charges Dismissed Domestic Battery
Client and his husband were involved in a verbal argument. The alleged victim contacted police against the claiming that he threw a glass of milk on him. Under the law, this is considered a battery. Attorney Thompson represented the Client on both the criminal case and the injunction and both were dismissed.
-
Charges Reduced Aggravated Battery on Law Enforcement Officer
Attorney Thompson provided the State with an extensive mitigation packet outlining the Defendant’s military service record and disability based on PTSD. Defendant was offered a minor jail sanction (60) days followed by probation in lieu of a 5-year minimum prison sentence as was originally offered by the State.