Top
Drug Paraphernalia

Dayton Beach Drug Paraphernalia Lawyer

Aggressive Defense Against Drug Paraphernalia Charges in Florida  

At Thompson Law, P.A., we are committed to providing professional legal services to our clients in Daytona Beach and the surrounding areas. We specialize in a wide range of legal matters, including drug-related offenses. If you are facing charges related to drug paraphernalia, having a skilled attorney by your side is essential. 

Call Thompson Law, P.A. today at (386) 280-4977 or contact us online to schedule a meeting with our drug paraphernalia attorney in Daytona Beach!

What is Drug Paraphernalia?

Drug paraphernalia refers to various items, equipment, or materials used in the manufacturing, packaging, or consumption of controlled substances, such as drugs. The Florida Statutes specifically define drug paraphernalia in Section 893.145. It encompasses a broad range of objects, including but not limited to:

  • Pipes and Bongs: Devices used for smoking or inhaling drugs.
  • Syringes and Needles: Commonly associated with intravenous drug use.
  • Containers: Jars, bags, or other receptacles for storing or concealing controlled substances.
  • Scales and Balances: Used for weighing drugs, often to measure portions for sale.
  • Spoons and Other Utensils: Frequently employed to prepare drugs for consumption.
  • Rolling Papers: Used for making homemade cigarettes, often filled with illicit substances.
  • Testing Equipment: Kits or devices designed to test the purity or potency of drugs.
  • Roach Clips: Clamps or holders designed for securing partially smoked marijuana cigarettes (roach clips).

Possession, sale, manufacture, or advertisement of drug paraphernalia is illegal in Florida and can lead to serious legal consequences.

What are the Penalties for Drug Paraphernalia in Florida?

The penalties for drug paraphernalia offenses in Florida can vary depending on the specifics of your case and your prior criminal record. However, some common consequences include:

  • Misdemeanor Charges: In many cases, drug paraphernalia offenses are classified as first-degree misdemeanors, resulting in up to one year in jail and fines of up to $1,000.
  • Felony Charges: If the drug paraphernalia was used with the cultivation, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances, you could face felony charges. Felonies carry much more severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences.
  • Probation: A judge may also sentence you to probation, including regular drug testing, mandatory counseling or treatment programs, and restricted travel.
  • Criminal Record: A conviction for a drug paraphernalia offense can leave a lasting mark on your criminal record, impacting your future employment prospects and other aspects of your life.

Defenses Against Drug Paraphernalia Charges

Facing drug paraphernalia charges can be intimidating, but several potential defenses can be used to protect your rights and challenge the allegations. These defenses may include:

  • Lack of Knowledge: Proving that you were unaware that the items in your possession were drug paraphernalia can be a strong defense. Demonstrating that you did not know the items' intended use can cast doubt on the charges against you.
  • Illegal Search and Seizure: If the evidence against you was obtained through law enforcement's illegal search or seizure, it may be inadmissible in court. This can lead to the dismissal of your case.
  • Valid Medical Prescription: If you have a valid prescription for the items in question, such as syringes or specific medical devices, you may have a strong defense against drug paraphernalia charges.
  • Inaccurate Testing or Identification: Challenging the accuracy of the testing or identification of the alleged paraphernalia can also be an effective defense strategy. Mistakes can occur during the testing process, and these errors can be exposed during your defense.

Client-Focused. RESULT-DRIVEN.

Working Closely with You To Build a Strong Case
  • All Charges Reduced Aggravated Battery

    Attorney Thompson conducted depositions on the alleged victim and third-party witness. Attorney Thompson was able to show that the victim was harassing the Defendant and was not being truthful to the police. Attorney Thompson filed Order to Show Cause against the third-party witness for avoiding subpoena for depositions.

  • All Charges Reduced Aggravated Assault with a Firearm

    Client was accused of shooting a shotgun over the head of two minors. Attorney Thompson did a public records request to discover that officers reported to the scene of the crime the night of the incident and spoke to the victims on the evening the alleged crime occurred and believed the victims to be intoxicated and unreliable. Attorney Thompson conducted depositions of the officers and ultimately all charges were reduced to a misdemeanor and no incarceration.

  • All Charges Dismissed Racing on the Highway

    Client was arrested after leaving a car show in a fast vehicle. Officers suspected the client of racing another vehicle and police officers pulled him over, drug him out of his vehicle, and arrested him for both racing on the highway and resisting an officer without violence. Upon review of the body camera video, Attorney Matt Thompson raised an excessive use of force complaint against the arresting officer. All charges against the client were dismissed.

  • All Charges Dismissed Robbery

    Attorney Thompson met with the Client soon after his arrest. It was clear that the person who was in the vehicle with the Client was the person guilty of committing the robbery and that the Client was more of a bystander. Attorney Thompson provided information to the State Attorney’s Office to separate the Client from the co-defendant. The information provided to the State resulted in all charges against the Defendant being dismissed.

  • All Charges Dismissed Battery

    The Client was working as a part time substitute teacher to help generate income to help his sick child granddaughter. While working there were children acting up and he instructed the child to stay in his seat while the others went to recess. The child claimed that the client hit him and told administration. Attorney Thompson did a public records request to obtain reports from the Department of Children and Families and noticed serious discrepancies in the child’s story. Attorney Thompson was able to p

  • Charges Reduced Aggravated Battery on Law Enforcement Officer

    Attorney Thompson provided the State with an extensive mitigation packet outlining the Defendant’s military service record and disability based on PTSD. Defendant was offered a minor jail sanction (60) days followed by probation in lieu of a 5-year minimum prison sentence as was originally offered by the State.